cycleqa.com
Norwegian electronics manufacturing test bench — row of instruments with green calibration labels, one instrument with red OVERDUE tag at the far right
· 6 min read

The instrument passed every test.
The certificate had expired six days earlier.

How a calibration gap put 140 medical power supplies in limbo — and what Vestfold Power AS did about it.

140
units tested on overdue instrument
6
days overdue before discovery
0
instruments overdue after CycleQA

Production as usual

Vestfold Power AS manufactures AC/DC power supplies for medical, maritime, and industrial customers from their facility in Horten, Vestfold. Their medical PSU line operates under ISO 13485 and IEC 60601-1 — every unit tested before it leaves the factory.

Production testing relies on calibrated instruments. One of them , the primary current reference for end-of-line load testing — had a 12-month calibration interval tracked manually in a shared Excel file.

The due date passed. The Excel file was not opened. Production continued.

Six days. In those six days, 140 units of PSU-MED-24-10 had gone through that bench — and 50 of them were already at the customer.

Discovery

Six days after the due date, an internal QMS calendar review caught it. By then, 140 units of PSU-MED-24-10 had been tested on an instrument with unknown calibration status. Fifty were already at Medi-Nordic AS — sitting in their incoming inspection area.

ISO 13485 clause 7.6 is unambiguous: when measuring equipment is found out of calibration, you must assess the validity of every result produced since the last known-good calibration. That means a decision: wait for the instrument to be re-calibrated, compare the as-found condition against tolerance, then either release the batches or initiate a recall.

CycleQA calibration equipment list — EQUIP-VFP-001 Chroma 63204 showing OVERDUE red status, two Rigol multimeters DUE SOON amber, remainder current green
Calibration → Equipment — Henrik Lindqvist, quality manager, sees this on a Monday morning. Device 63204 shows OVERDUE in red. Two Rigol multimeters are DUE SOON in amber. No investigation required — the system tells you the status of every instrument, at every site, in real time.

Containment

The containment was clean. The device was removed from bench T03 immediately — red tag, do not use. Munich contacted the same day, emergency calibration appointment booked. Medi-Nordic AS notified the following morning per SOP-QA-CUST-003. Batch CH-VFP-2026-008 (50 units at the customer) placed on quality hold. Batches CH-VFP-2026-006 and CH-VFP-2026-007 (90 units in finished goods) quarantined.

PSU-MED-24-10 production temporarily suspended.

CycleQA NCR-VFP-2026-001 — title, severity critical, status investigation, 140 units affected, batch numbers
NCR-VFP-2026-001 — the non-conformance report opened the same day as discovery. Severity: critical. Status: investigation. Quantity affected: 140. Batch numbers on record. Everything traceable — from the instrument to the batch to the customer.

Root cause

The root cause was not the instrument. It was the system.

5-Why root cause analysis
Why 1Calibration interval exceeded → due date not visible in the production area
Why 2Due date not visible → calibration schedule existed only in the quality manager's Excel file
Why 3Excel file not reviewed → no defined review cadence or ownership
Why 4No review cadence → SOP-QA-CAL-001 does not mandate automated alerting
Root causeCalibration management relies entirely on manual human attention — no automated alert, no escalation path, no visibility at the point of use

This is the gap ISO 13485 auditors find. Not because manufacturers are careless — but because tracking calibration manually at any scale is genuinely hard to do reliably.

CycleQA RISK-VFP-002 linkages — NCR-VFP-2026-001 linked as caused_by, ISO 13485 clause 7.6 as standard, IEC 60601-1 Annex A
RISK-VFP-002 — the risk "ISO 13485 calibration gap — repeat finding at next Nemko audit" is directly linked to NCR-VFP-2026-001 (caused_by) and to ISO 13485 clause 7.6. The risk existed already — as an audit observation from 2025. The NCR confirmed it.

Outcome

The Device 63204 came back from Munich in June: found in tolerance. All test results produced during the overdue window were retrospectively validated per ISO 13485 clause 7.6. The batches were released. Medi-Nordic AS lifted the quality hold.

Actual cost
NOK 15,000
Calibration (NOK 8,500) + downtime + customer notification. Instrument found in tolerance.
Alternative — instrument out of tolerance
NOK 85,000
Recall of CH-VFP-2026-008 from Medi-Nordic AS + scrap of affected units + formal customer communication.

The corrective action

CycleQA replaced the Excel file with instrument-level tracking: calibration due dates, automated alerts at 30 and 7 days before the due date, and a live status indicator — OVERDUE / DUE SOON / CURRENT — visible on every instrument record. Both the production supervisor and quality manager receive alerts. No instrument operates past its due date without a deliberate decision.

CycleQA CA-VFP-2026-001-01 — corrective action: implement CycleQA calibration module, assigned to Henrik Lindqvist, due July 2026, linked to NCR and risk
CA-VFP-2026-001-01 — the corrective action is traceable, assigned, and time-bound. Due: 1 July 2026. Linked to NCR-VFP-2026-001 and RISK-VFP-002. The Nemko ISO 13485 surveillance audit is in Q4 — this action must be closed before then.

The Nemko ISO 13485 surveillance audit is in Q4 2026. This time, calibration management will not be an observation.

Industry: Medical devices · Maritime · Industrial Standards: ISO 13485:2016 · IEC 60601-1 · IEC 60945 Location: Horten, Vestfold, Norway
CycleQA — Calibration Management
A Quality Management System built for regulated SME manufacturers in Scandinavia and DACH. Calibration due dates, automated alerts, instrument-linked traceability. If this resonates with a problem your team has lived through, we would like to hear about it.
cycleqa.com
"Good tools make doing it right faster than doing it wrong."
#QualityManagement #ISO13485 #Calibration #MedicalDevices #Manufacturing #Norway #CycleQA

Fictive scenario. All companies, persons, product names, batch numbers, and record numbers described in this story are entirely fictitious and used for illustrative purposes only. Vestfold Power AS, Medi-Nordic AS, Henrik Lindqvist, Marta Engström, and all associated names are invented. Any resemblance to real companies, persons, or events is coincidental. All QMS data shown is from a live CycleQA demo database.

© 2026 CycleQA AS · All rights reserved · cycleqa.com ·